Former Browns player files huge lawsuit against another NFL team

The litigation makes a lot of claims 

The Kansas City Chiefs are being sued by one of their former workers. Disgruntled ex-employees are nothing new, but this situation goes pretty deep.

Ramzee Robinson was the Chiefs’ Director of Player Engagement, a position responsible for supporting players’ well-being and development both on and off the field. Robinson is a former NFL player himself having played cornerback for the Detroit Lions, Philadelphia Eagles, Cleveland Browns, Washington Redskins, and Denver Broncos. He then finished out his playing career for two seasons in the CFL with the Saskatchewan Roughriders.

In the 2007 NFL draft, Robinson was named Mr. Irrelevant as he was the final pick by the Lions.

Robinson is suing the Chiefs for wrongful termination, filing this week in an 11-page complaint in the United States Court for the Western District of Missouri – Western Division. The core of the lawsuit claims racial discrimination.

RELATED: COMPLETE COMPLAINT ROBINSON V CHIEFS

According to Robinson’s complaint, there are several issues. He was let go this past February, six days after the Super Bowl loss.

For one, he is stating that black employees of the Chiefs are paid less than their white counterparts. Secondly, there is a videotape that accuses Robinson of acts against a female office worker, and the Chiefs fired him without allowing him to see the video evidence. Another claim is that another NFL team, the Houston Texans, wanted to interview him for an open position, but the Chiefs halted that process.

The lawsuit is seeking an unspecified number of damages, but the docket includes a demand for $5 million. In a nutshell, Robinson is suing for racial discrimination, team retaliation, and tortious interference with business expectancy in regards to the interference with the Texans’ interview.

In regard to the claim that black employees are passed over or paid less, the suit gives an example of a black female employee who was paid $50,000 a year and was refused a promotion. After she resigned, a white female, Melissa Weinsz, who is a Ph.D., replaced her at a rate of $80,000 a year.

When asked for a comment on the suit by Pro Football Talk, Chiefs V.P. of football communications Brad Gee stated what is pretty much a standard response in these situations:

“We can’t comment because it’s an active legal matter. But to be clear, the Chiefs do not tolerate discrimination of any kind. We look forward to the facts of this case coming to light.”

Robinson entered the league in Round 7, after playing cornerback at Alabama with 50 games played. He graduated with a degree in business management. After his pro career ended, he earned a master’s degree in professional counseling from Webster University. He is currently a doctoral candidate at The Chicago School in Applied Behavior Analysis.

After two seasons with Detroit, he signed a one-year deal with the Eagles but was released towards the end of the 2009 season after playing three games. The Browns claimed him off waivers. Robinson played in four contests and was inactive for another while with Cleveland. He had five total tackles, all on special teams. He then spent time with Washington, Denver, and Saskatchewan.

Robinson’s complaint states that he was fired by Kansas City for “conduct detrimental to the league.”

He was employed for nine years with the Chiefs, which began at a salary of $35,000 and grew to $125,000 a year. But in the suit, it alleges that he was underpaid in his profession in comparison to other NFL clubs with the same job title, with salaries around $171,000. When asked for a review, Robinson states the team declined.

Robinson’s attorney, Katrina Y. Robertson, issued this statement to the press:

“My client dedicated years of professional service to the Chiefs organization and supported players through critical personal and professional challenges. This lawsuit seeks to hold the organization accountable for the systemic inequities and retaliation he faced for simply demanding fairness.”

According to the Chiefs, the video is at the heart of this matter.

Apparently, the security cameras picked up Robinson attacking Weinsz. This will ultimately become the key piece of evidence in the case. The Chiefs are claiming that Robinson is dangerous and has acted inappropriately around white female co-workers.

In the lawsuit, Robinson, age 41, is demanding a jury trial.

The termination began when Robinson’s supervisor, Kirsten Krug, accused him of attacking a ‘white female coworker’ after seeing the security footage. The woman was Weinsz. After the Super Bowl, Krug went into Robinson’s office and accused him of the attack. When asked to review the video, Krug and the Chiefs refused.

The Chief of Security was summoned, Robinson’s employment was terminated, and Krug confiscated his laptop.

Attorney Robertson stated:

“(Robinson) unequivocally denies having been in an altercation with anyone.”

The lawsuit goes on to say that Robinson’s firing was a direct result of his race.

When the Texans were asked about Robinson and his accusatory issues, the team declined to comment.

The relevant language in the complaint appears in paragraph 24:

“Some months before his termination, Mark Donovan pressured Plaintiff to renew his contract and claimed that the contract would offer him stability. After Plaintiff signed, the Houston Texans asked KC Chiefs’ management to interview Plaintiff. The KC Chiefs refused. The KC Chiefs told the Texans that an interview would violate his contract. Plaintiff discovered this information when a representative from the Texans called him personally and asked him about this missed opportunity.”

Regarding this portion of the complaint, the NFL’s Anti-Tampering Policy covers this situation.

The Chiefs had every right under the policy to refuse to allow Robinson to interview with Houston because they weren’t offering him a high-level position, and it is considered to be a lateral move. In fact, the very essence of Robinson mentioning the Texans may work against him. The fact that he states the Texans “called him personally and asked him about this missed opportunity” just may become a violation of the Anti-Tampering policy.

Houston may also be in violation if this rings true. Teams cannot reach out to employees of other teams without permission or if those employees have expired contracts. In the end, the Texans just might become involved in a tampering investigation by the NFL.